Editorial Standards & Principles
"At AlSachach, we prioritize the clarity of thought over the speed of transmission."
Article I: Core Principles
Accuracy Over Speed
We rigorously fact-check every assertion. Speed is never an excuse for error or oversight in our process. The rush to publish is the enemy of the truth.
Practical Implication
We delay publication rather than risk ambiguity.
Intellectual Independence
Our editorial judgment is free from external influence, commercial pressure, or political expediency. We serve the reader's intellect, not a stakeholder's interest.
Practical Implication
We disclose all potential conflicts of interest immediately.
Constructive Skepticism
We approach all claims with a healthy dose of doubt, requiring evidence commensurate with the magnitude of the statement. Skepticism is the tool we use to refine understanding.
Practical Implication
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence before any mention.
Clarity of Language
Obscurity is not depth. We strive for precision in every sentence, avoiding jargon that alienates and vagueness that confuses.
Practical Implication
We rewrite until the complex becomes comprehensible without losing nuance.
Proportionality
We assign coverage based on significance, not sensation. We resist the urge to amplify trivialities for the sake of engagement.
Practical Implication
Viral potential is never a factor in editorial selection.
Enduring Value
We aim to produce work that remains relevant. Our focus is on the structural underpinnings of events, not just the fleeting surface noise.
Practical Implication
We prioritize long-form analysis over breaking news tickers.
Clarity Over Cleverness
We eschew wit when it comes at the expense of comprehension. Our primary duty is to inform and elucidate, not to impress with linguistic acrobatics.
Practical Implication
Metaphor and analogy are used strictly to clarify, never to obscure.
First-Principles Reasoning
We dismantle complex problems to their fundamental truths rather than relying on analogy or received wisdom. We build our arguments from the ground up.
Practical Implication
We question the premise before accepting the conclusion.
Steel-manning Arguments
We address the strongest possible version of opposing viewpoints. Engaging with weak or misrepresented arguments serves neither the truth nor our readers.
Practical Implication
We reconstruct opposing views charitably before critique.
Intellectual Humility
We acknowledge the limits of our knowledge. Where data is scarce or conclusions are tentative, we state so explicitly rather than feigning certainty.
Practical Implication
Confidence intervals are communicated alongside conclusions.
Sourcing & Verification
Every claim of fact must be traceable to a primary source. We do not rely on secondary reporting when original documentation is available.
Practical Implication
Hyperlinks provided always lead to original data, not interpretation.
Long-term Relevance
We write for the archive, not just the feed. Our content is designed to provide value that compounds over time, serving as a reference for future inquiry.
Practical Implication
We evaluate article topics by their potential utility in five years.
The Threshold of Publication
"Content is released only when it adds genuine understanding to the discourse. If it does not clarify, it does not belong on AlSachach."
Handling Uncertainty
Error Correction
When we err, we correct openly and immediately. Corrections are prominently displayed at the top of the relevant article, detailing exactly what was changed and why.
Attribution
We credit sources explicitly. Anonymous sourcing is used only as a last resort when the information is vital and the source's safety is at risk, and it is always flagged to the reader.